Intelligence · media
OpenAI and Google back shared AI training control
At a glance
- OpenAI, Google and Microsoft backed a proposed shared website AI-training preference on October 30.
- The draft uses existing robots.txt Allow and Disallow rules; it does not itself prevent crawling or search indexing.
- Adoption schedules differ, and Microsoft has separate controls for training versus grounding AI-generated answers.
What changed
On October 30, OpenAI, Google and Microsoft announced support for a common website preference for generative AI training, based on an IETF Internet-Draft authored by Anthropic's K. Kelley. The proposed token works within robots.txt, rather than replacing existing crawler rules. OpenAI expects to implement it in the coming months, Google plans support in 2027 and Microsoft says its controls start taking effect on February 1, 2027. The IETF draft is not a finalized standard, and cross-provider compliance has not been tested by AICV News.
Full read
Web publishers may soon be able to express one AI-training preference to several major AI developers, instead of maintaining separate instructions for each company. On October 30, OpenAI, Google and Microsoft backed a proposed common signal. This is an agreement to pursue a shared mechanism, not evidence that it already works everywhere.
The Internet-Draft written by Anthropic's K. Kelley uses the existing robots.txt file and a new policy token, __usage_ai-training. A website operator could use familiar Allow and Disallow rules to express preferences for the use of individual paths in training generative AI models. The proposed token changes no ordinary crawling rules: a preference about training does not itself prevent a bot from visiting a page.
Adoption schedules differ. OpenAI says it aims to implement the signal in the coming months and will keep its existing crawler controls. Google plans support in 2027, with its separate Google-Extended preference still available. Microsoft says its controls will begin to take effect as pages are crawled from February 1, 2027. Microsoft also announced separate page-level choices governing whether content may be used to inform AI-generated answers, sometimes called grounding. Sites using its older NoArchive or NoCache preferences may need to take transition steps by March 1, 2027.
That distinction matters to publishers. Choosing to withhold content from training is not the same as preventing traditional search indexing or preventing AI-generated answers from citing it. Microsoft says search eligibility is separate, although restrictions on grounding can reduce visibility in its AI experiences. Neither choice promises citations or referral traffic.
The IETF document remains a working draft, not a finished Internet standard. We have not tested any provider's implementation or compliance. The announcements do not establish that every AI company will honor the preference or that it guarantees compensation for content.
Why it matters here
Our read: For publishers and businesses, deciding whether a model trains on their content is different from deciding whether an AI system can cite it in an answer. A common training preference may simplify the first choice, but does not promise discoverability, referral traffic or compensation.
One question worth testing
How will each participating provider demonstrate that it has implemented and honors the new preference?
Sources
- Making it easier for websites to express AI training preferences — OpenAI (2026-10-30)
- Supporting a shared AI training control for websites — Google Search Central (2026-10-30)
- Your content, your choice: clearer preferences for training and grounding — Microsoft Bing (2026-10-30)
- Machine-Readable Training Preference Signal, Internet-Draft 00 — IETF Datatracker / K. Kelley (2026-10-30)
Not confirmed by us
- The IETF document is an individual Internet-Draft still under discussion, not a ratified IETF standard or proof of operational compliance.
- OpenAI's, Google's and Microsoft's implementation timing statements are plans; AICV News did not independently test any crawler, training use or provider compliance.
- No measured change in search referrals, citations, training use or publisher compensation is established by these announcements.
How this was made: researched and written at the desk with AI; every figure checked against its source by Firecrawl Agent Spark 2, separate original-page check of five supported claim groups, with a planted-error test the check caught; published by Sat Singh on November 1, 2026.